The Situation of the Jordanian Legislator from the Interpretation of the Judicial Judgment

Mamoon Ahmed Al-Hunaiti1, Mohammed Naser Al Khawaldeh2, Mustafa Mousa Alajarmeh3, Ismael Mohammad Al-halalmeh4 & Yassine Ahmad Alqudah5

https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.4.129.142

Abstract
Study aims to discuss regulating the provisions of judicial judgments interpretation in Jordanian law regarding the practical necessity in making the ambiguous judgments issued by the court enforceable. As well as the provision in the execution law obliges the chief executive officer to request clarification from the court (issued the judgment) due to its ambiguity, which does not replace the importance of regulating this issue in the Jordanian Code of Civil Procedure. The researcher concluded that the regulation of the provisions of judicial judgments interpretation in Jordanian Civil Code, which is tainted with ambiguity, must include granting the right to request interpretation to the litigants and to the court (issued the judgment). It shall also include provisions of the ruling interpretation and grant the right to the litigants and the court in requesting the interpretation. So that the court shall always be competent to request the interpretation, if it has to comply with the interpretation regulations in order not to abuse the authority in interpreting in a way that makes its judgment subject to appeal. The researcher also discusses the importance of determining the procedures that shall be followed to submit the interpretation request; moreover, the researcher concludes the impact of appealing the original judgment issued by the court.

Keywords: Interpretation, judicial, judgments, ambiguity, court, clarification.